<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2009 broadsheet letter writing challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/</link>
	<description>Casting aspersions on purveyors of mediocrity since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-6031</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/?p=784#comment-6031</guid>
		<description>I win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-5959</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/?p=784#comment-5959</guid>
		<description>For Phil:

&lt;blockquote&gt;So Leslie Kemeny dismisses the established - and economically viable - renewable energy sector as &#039;&#039;pseudo-science&#039;&#039; while spruiking the environmental friendliness of nuclear energy. Now I have seen everything.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Phil:</p>
<blockquote><p>So Leslie Kemeny dismisses the established &#8211; and economically viable &#8211; renewable energy sector as &#8221;pseudo-science&#8221; while spruiking the environmental friendliness of nuclear energy. Now I have seen everything.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-5687</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/?p=784#comment-5687</guid>
		<description>Marcus Coleman (Letters, May 26) would be providing a sound argument but for one fatal flaw: SCEGGS, unlike the judiciary or the Independent Commission Against Corruption, is a private institution.

Joel Courtney Haberfield

+30 to moi :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus Coleman (Letters, May 26) would be providing a sound argument but for one fatal flaw: SCEGGS, unlike the judiciary or the Independent Commission Against Corruption, is a private institution.</p>
<p>Joel Courtney Haberfield</p>
<p>+30 to moi <img src='http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-5653</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/?p=784#comment-5653</guid>
		<description>From 21 January:

Super blooper
Nano Burke (Letters, January 21) seems to believe that the 9 per cent superannuation contribution by employers is a donation. In fact it is part of an employee&#039;s salary. If the government did not mandate superannuation, that 9 per cent would form part of the take-home salary, not retirement savings.
Joel Courtney, Haberfield

47 points :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 21 January:</p>
<p>Super blooper<br />
Nano Burke (Letters, January 21) seems to believe that the 9 per cent superannuation contribution by employers is a donation. In fact it is part of an employee&#8217;s salary. If the government did not mandate superannuation, that 9 per cent would form part of the take-home salary, not retirement savings.<br />
Joel Courtney, Haberfield</p>
<p>47 points <img src='http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-5652</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/?p=784#comment-5652</guid>
		<description>For Phil:

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/column-8/column-8-20090224-8gt1.html?page=2&quot;&gt;&quot;I propose that the difference between sacks and bags has nothing to do with size,&quot; suggests Phillip Brian of Newtown (Column 8, yesterday). &quot;A sack is slung over or hoisted onto your shoulder, whereas a bag is carried arms-downward. Please send my regards to all ladies sporting expensive designer hand-sacks.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

50 points!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Phil:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/column-8/column-8-20090224-8gt1.html?page=2"><p>&#8220;I propose that the difference between sacks and bags has nothing to do with size,&#8221; suggests Phillip Brian of Newtown (Column 8, yesterday). &#8220;A sack is slung over or hoisted onto your shoulder, whereas a bag is carried arms-downward. Please send my regards to all ladies sporting expensive designer hand-sacks.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>50 points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-5642</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/?p=784#comment-5642</guid>
		<description>Ha! I win for once :)

I didn&#039;t win the &#039;07 challenge iirc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I win for once <img src='http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t win the &#8217;07 challenge iirc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/2009/01/the-2009-broadsheet-letter-writing-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-5639</link>
		<dc:creator>Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marsupialmusic.net/stu/?p=784#comment-5639</guid>
		<description>Are the results declared null and void in absence of any entrants who are not Joel W Courtney? it seems to be an annual occurrence.

Although I do love the extensive use of the rhetorical question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the results declared null and void in absence of any entrants who are not Joel W Courtney? it seems to be an annual occurrence.</p>
<p>Although I do love the extensive use of the rhetorical question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.307 seconds -->
